<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New 2: TRANSFORMATION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mybigdebate.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:00:17 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Loraine Mamotse</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Loraine Mamotse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Apartheid was a systematic process. Small children were enforcing it.
Blacks  owning land and live stock were forcefully removed from their land and families were separated when men came to the Cities to work in the mines. Therefore poverty amongs blacks was ochestrated it did not just happen. Yolanda please inform yourself of the history of Black people in this country. 
Therefore to address the injustice of the past we need to use a systematic way to change the scale. When people in a marriage relationship are unfaithful to each other and the result of their unfaithfulness leads to divorce and illegitimate children, do not blame the marriage, deal with the people. Marriage institution is holy.Therefore when transformation seems not to work or  benefit the majority just know that it is not the system but someone who is not doing what they are suppose to do. Transformation gives a voice to the voiceless and if properly practiced it has opportunitites for training both blacks and whites about their rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apartheid was a systematic process. Small children were enforcing it.<br />
Blacks  owning land and live stock were forcefully removed from their land and families were separated when men came to the Cities to work in the mines. Therefore poverty amongs blacks was ochestrated it did not just happen. Yolanda please inform yourself of the history of Black people in this country.<br />
Therefore to address the injustice of the past we need to use a systematic way to change the scale. When people in a marriage relationship are unfaithful to each other and the result of their unfaithfulness leads to divorce and illegitimate children, do not blame the marriage, deal with the people. Marriage institution is holy.Therefore when transformation seems not to work or  benefit the majority just know that it is not the system but someone who is not doing what they are suppose to do. Transformation gives a voice to the voiceless and if properly practiced it has opportunitites for training both blacks and whites about their rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 15:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-495</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt that transformation is necessary in South Africa. And, I am sure that there are examples of it having been successful. However, it has ironically been delivered inequitably over the past 15 years. Firstly, affirmative action, BEE and associated tools of transformation have benefitted only a few connected individuals leaving the vast majority of South Africans with little benefit. These transformation tools have also become a form of social engineering which clearly hasn&#039;t paid off when we look at some of our parastatal institutions. Affirmative action should be more than ratios and quotas - a crude one-size-fits-all approach to a far more complex task. It should address the unique situation within all fields and sectors within the economy. For example, the numbers of students graduating within a given profession should behaps be analysed and AA/BEE ratios within sectors revised based on the gender and race composition. Where there are sectors that do not refect the demographics of the country as a whole, efforts should be made to try build interest in that sector.  AA is perhaps best addressed at our tertiary and training institutions where every effort can be made to provide skills and expertise to young South Africans no matter what their backgrounds. Standards should never be compromised but rather help should be given ensure that everybody can meet that high standard no matter what their background and circumstance.

Transformation is necessary. However, as a crude form of social engineering it will fail and that is a risk we should not be willing to take. I believe our future as a viable, economically stable democracy depends on it.

Thank you for the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt that transformation is necessary in South Africa. And, I am sure that there are examples of it having been successful. However, it has ironically been delivered inequitably over the past 15 years. Firstly, affirmative action, BEE and associated tools of transformation have benefitted only a few connected individuals leaving the vast majority of South Africans with little benefit. These transformation tools have also become a form of social engineering which clearly hasn&#8217;t paid off when we look at some of our parastatal institutions. Affirmative action should be more than ratios and quotas &#8211; a crude one-size-fits-all approach to a far more complex task. It should address the unique situation within all fields and sectors within the economy. For example, the numbers of students graduating within a given profession should behaps be analysed and AA/BEE ratios within sectors revised based on the gender and race composition. Where there are sectors that do not refect the demographics of the country as a whole, efforts should be made to try build interest in that sector.  AA is perhaps best addressed at our tertiary and training institutions where every effort can be made to provide skills and expertise to young South Africans no matter what their backgrounds. Standards should never be compromised but rather help should be given ensure that everybody can meet that high standard no matter what their background and circumstance.</p>
<p>Transformation is necessary. However, as a crude form of social engineering it will fail and that is a risk we should not be willing to take. I believe our future as a viable, economically stable democracy depends on it.</p>
<p>Thank you for the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mzukisi Ndzipo</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Mzukisi Ndzipo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-371</guid>
		<description>At the risk of being petty and personal I wish to thank Yolanda for her reiterative response. I also wish to point to her that her opening line appears to border on condescension towards my person. What is redemptive of her indiscretion in that regard is her concession of her being an &quot;average Jane.&quot; It would be beneficial for her and others like her to strive to increase their cognitive content regarding this country&#039;s current and past racial relations and broader transformation issues. An initial step in that direction would be a re-read of my initial response and a deep ponderation thereupon PRIOR to attempting to rubbish it in the manner she has attempted above...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the risk of being petty and personal I wish to thank Yolanda for her reiterative response. I also wish to point to her that her opening line appears to border on condescension towards my person. What is redemptive of her indiscretion in that regard is her concession of her being an &#8220;average Jane.&#8221; It would be beneficial for her and others like her to strive to increase their cognitive content regarding this country&#8217;s current and past racial relations and broader transformation issues. An initial step in that direction would be a re-read of my initial response and a deep ponderation thereupon PRIOR to attempting to rubbish it in the manner she has attempted above&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yolanda McCabe</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Yolanda McCabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-286</guid>
		<description>Hi Mzukisi Ndzipo,
What you say is what we know. What we&#039;re adding is that the process seems to enrich only some of the &quot;indigenous majority&quot; and that&#039;s unfair. Poverty doesn&#039;t distinguish between skin colours. Neither does sickness and death. It just so happens that the majority is black. All the poor are suffering.
BEE is a great thing, but not the solution. As I mentioned in my previous reply: even if you replace ALL whites in ALL jobs in South Africa, it will still leave 34.67 million Africans in South Africa (http://www.statssa.gov.za/PublicationsHTML/P03022009/html/P03022009.html) So, does BEE solve all our problems?
What other transformation plans are there? I only know of BEE (sorry, I&#039;m not a politician or academic, just an average-Jane born and bred in SA). My question is sincere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mzukisi Ndzipo,<br />
What you say is what we know. What we&#8217;re adding is that the process seems to enrich only some of the &#8220;indigenous majority&#8221; and that&#8217;s unfair. Poverty doesn&#8217;t distinguish between skin colours. Neither does sickness and death. It just so happens that the majority is black. All the poor are suffering.<br />
BEE is a great thing, but not the solution. As I mentioned in my previous reply: even if you replace ALL whites in ALL jobs in South Africa, it will still leave 34.67 million Africans in South Africa (<a href="http://www.statssa.gov.za/PublicationsHTML/P03022009/html/P03022009.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.statssa.gov.za/PublicationsHTML/P03022009/html/P03022009.html</a>) So, does BEE solve all our problems?<br />
What other transformation plans are there? I only know of BEE (sorry, I&#8217;m not a politician or academic, just an average-Jane born and bred in SA). My question is sincere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sduduzo Ka-Mbili</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Sduduzo Ka-Mbili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-278</guid>
		<description>Change is inevitable, whether anyone likes it or not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Change is inevitable, whether anyone likes it or not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mzukisi Ndzipo</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Mzukisi Ndzipo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-267</guid>
		<description>It is highly disconcerting to hear people talk about BEE/transformation being &#039;reverse discrimination&#039;.  Such people use the fact that it has been 15 years since democracy-what more do they (blacks) want?  They (dissidents of the transformation agenda) are really unaware or perhaps even in  conscious denial of how little things have changed in heavily patriarchal and lilly white corporate South Africa.  
Talk to any ambitious young black professional in ANY industry and you will learn that much still has to be done.  

South Africa is rated as one of THE MOST unequal of all countries in the world, and such inequality was DELIBERATELY designed by the former apartheid government to be along RACIAL lines.  To be blunt: economic prosperity has a pale complexion (white) whereas abject poverty and squalor has a dark complexion (African).  Therefore any attempt to redress this inequality has to, necessarily, take on a racial dimension-hence BEE.  
If we are to be really honest, we should also rid our soceity of the notion of  &#039;PREVIOUSLY disadvantaged&#039; as this creates the VERY false impression that the African majority has arrived and has thus become currently advantaged. 
Let it be said UNEQUIVOCABLY: the African majority of South Africa is still very much DISADVANTAGED.  The wheels of change have VIRTUALLY NOT moved at all for most of us-SISA HLUPHEKA.  That is a hard fact by any cursory look at SoUth Afrca&#039;s socio-economics.

If there is something wrong with the BEE model of transformation, let it be attended to as a matter of urgency and let there be suggested alternatives that will NOT compromise the transformation agenda.  But to call for its scrapping is absolutely laughable given where we are as a nation regarding transformation.  Let not those who are fundamentally opposed to transformation capitalise on any shortcomings of the BEE model or any other transformation initiative of the state.  They are being quite opportunistic...

South Africa will implode if the economic pie continues to grow and be enjoyed to the exclusion of the African majority.  Growing inequality, especially along racial lines is the biggest threat to social stability anywhere in the world.  
Regardless of race, a socially unstable South Africa will be a nightmare for all.  We all have a vested interest in a prosperous country, so let us not seek to achieve and enjoy it to the exclusion of anyone-least of all the indigenous majority. Otherwise the bubble WILL burst-it really is a basic matter of fact.

Transformation must be strived for in whatever model deemed appropriate to achieve the redressing of economic inequalities that span centuries.  

Whether the economic elite realise it or not, meaningful transformation is also in their interest. &#039;Finish and Klaar!&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is highly disconcerting to hear people talk about BEE/transformation being &#8216;reverse discrimination&#8217;.  Such people use the fact that it has been 15 years since democracy-what more do they (blacks) want?  They (dissidents of the transformation agenda) are really unaware or perhaps even in  conscious denial of how little things have changed in heavily patriarchal and lilly white corporate South Africa.<br />
Talk to any ambitious young black professional in ANY industry and you will learn that much still has to be done.  </p>
<p>South Africa is rated as one of THE MOST unequal of all countries in the world, and such inequality was DELIBERATELY designed by the former apartheid government to be along RACIAL lines.  To be blunt: economic prosperity has a pale complexion (white) whereas abject poverty and squalor has a dark complexion (African).  Therefore any attempt to redress this inequality has to, necessarily, take on a racial dimension-hence BEE.<br />
If we are to be really honest, we should also rid our soceity of the notion of  &#8216;PREVIOUSLY disadvantaged&#8217; as this creates the VERY false impression that the African majority has arrived and has thus become currently advantaged.<br />
Let it be said UNEQUIVOCABLY: the African majority of South Africa is still very much DISADVANTAGED.  The wheels of change have VIRTUALLY NOT moved at all for most of us-SISA HLUPHEKA.  That is a hard fact by any cursory look at SoUth Afrca&#8217;s socio-economics.</p>
<p>If there is something wrong with the BEE model of transformation, let it be attended to as a matter of urgency and let there be suggested alternatives that will NOT compromise the transformation agenda.  But to call for its scrapping is absolutely laughable given where we are as a nation regarding transformation.  Let not those who are fundamentally opposed to transformation capitalise on any shortcomings of the BEE model or any other transformation initiative of the state.  They are being quite opportunistic&#8230;</p>
<p>South Africa will implode if the economic pie continues to grow and be enjoyed to the exclusion of the African majority.  Growing inequality, especially along racial lines is the biggest threat to social stability anywhere in the world.<br />
Regardless of race, a socially unstable South Africa will be a nightmare for all.  We all have a vested interest in a prosperous country, so let us not seek to achieve and enjoy it to the exclusion of anyone-least of all the indigenous majority. Otherwise the bubble WILL burst-it really is a basic matter of fact.</p>
<p>Transformation must be strived for in whatever model deemed appropriate to achieve the redressing of economic inequalities that span centuries.  </p>
<p>Whether the economic elite realise it or not, meaningful transformation is also in their interest. &#8216;Finish and Klaar!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnita Hill</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnita Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Big Debate Team
 
Thank you for a most incisive program - just wish you could lengthen it - all of your topics!  Issues are so complex they need to be more fully explored.  Although I must say, while the Transformation debate is fully understood by our intellectuals and has probably become somewhat tedious , the person on the street watching the program, must be left behind by the overly academic language employed by some participants.
 
I was surprised by the confused rendering of Advocate Ngoako Ramatlhodi&#039;s views and his intransigence in accepting that he was roundly trumped by the  clarity of  Dr. Ramphele&#039;s arguments (what an incredible woman!).  That irritated swinging of her elegantly shod foot and the occasional derisive smile made your show come alive.  Loved it!!!  Also, your other panelists : Pierre de Vos, Moeletsi Mbeki (what a courageous man) and the maligned Judge Kriegler, really illuminated the very real problems underlying the concepts of Transformation et al. 
 
We need to talk through all these issues, no matter how painful they are.  We will never attain Bishop Tutu&#039;s vision of a Rainbow Nation, unless we do.
 
Thank you for your immense contribution.  As my son would  say in Afrikaans : &quot;ETv. kook!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Debate Team</p>
<p>Thank you for a most incisive program &#8211; just wish you could lengthen it &#8211; all of your topics!  Issues are so complex they need to be more fully explored.  Although I must say, while the Transformation debate is fully understood by our intellectuals and has probably become somewhat tedious , the person on the street watching the program, must be left behind by the overly academic language employed by some participants.</p>
<p>I was surprised by the confused rendering of Advocate Ngoako Ramatlhodi&#8217;s views and his intransigence in accepting that he was roundly trumped by the  clarity of  Dr. Ramphele&#8217;s arguments (what an incredible woman!).  That irritated swinging of her elegantly shod foot and the occasional derisive smile made your show come alive.  Loved it!!!  Also, your other panelists : Pierre de Vos, Moeletsi Mbeki (what a courageous man) and the maligned Judge Kriegler, really illuminated the very real problems underlying the concepts of Transformation et al. </p>
<p>We need to talk through all these issues, no matter how painful they are.  We will never attain Bishop Tutu&#8217;s vision of a Rainbow Nation, unless we do.</p>
<p>Thank you for your immense contribution.  As my son would  say in Afrikaans : &#8220;ETv. kook!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maupi Monyemangene</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Maupi Monyemangene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Let me thank you for hosting our organisation on what turned to be a riveting, enthralling and engaging show. This must rate as one of the few talk shows peppered with fireworks that I have been to in a long while and I think it is indeed the “Big Debate”.
 
Maupi Monyemangene
 
Media Liaison Manager; Productivity SA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me thank you for hosting our organisation on what turned to be a riveting, enthralling and engaging show. This must rate as one of the few talk shows peppered with fireworks that I have been to in a long while and I think it is indeed the “Big Debate”.</p>
<p>Maupi Monyemangene</p>
<p>Media Liaison Manager; Productivity SA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yolanda</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Yolanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Even if ALL whites were replaced with black people, it will leave how many millions of black people unemployed? There are just too many &quot;previously disadvantaged&quot; people in SA and we&#039;re ever increasing. 
I loved the show today (13 November). Especially the Doctor who was the conveyer for the Dinokeng Scenarios (where can I find more information about her?). She was presenting logical dilemmas and pin-pointed mind-sets that are harming our country rather than building it up.

And thank you for reaching down to the lower levels of employment at the Post Office (who represent a great many institutions in our country) and letting them speak. If the Post Office was the winner, then what is going on in the companies who lost?  

Another thing: we are very upset when people are put on suspension with their full salaries (Millions of Rand per year) in tact while a so-called-investigation is pending for years and years. We just get three warnings and then fired. If we feel it was unworthy or unjustifiable the CCMA (who is doing great work) investigates but we’re not getting paid while ‘investigations are ongoing’!

It makes me think of &quot;All animals [people] are equal, but some are more equal than others,&quot; from Animal Farm written by George Orwell and published in England in 1945. He was a Democratic Socialist. His story seems to be getting more and more applicable on South Africa’s current state!  His story should be a warning to us! Only problem is, how can we do it differently? What would be the solution?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if ALL whites were replaced with black people, it will leave how many millions of black people unemployed? There are just too many &#8220;previously disadvantaged&#8221; people in SA and we&#8217;re ever increasing.<br />
I loved the show today (13 November). Especially the Doctor who was the conveyer for the Dinokeng Scenarios (where can I find more information about her?). She was presenting logical dilemmas and pin-pointed mind-sets that are harming our country rather than building it up.</p>
<p>And thank you for reaching down to the lower levels of employment at the Post Office (who represent a great many institutions in our country) and letting them speak. If the Post Office was the winner, then what is going on in the companies who lost?  </p>
<p>Another thing: we are very upset when people are put on suspension with their full salaries (Millions of Rand per year) in tact while a so-called-investigation is pending for years and years. We just get three warnings and then fired. If we feel it was unworthy or unjustifiable the CCMA (who is doing great work) investigates but we’re not getting paid while ‘investigations are ongoing’!</p>
<p>It makes me think of &#8220;All animals [people] are equal, but some are more equal than others,&#8221; from Animal Farm written by George Orwell and published in England in 1945. He was a Democratic Socialist. His story seems to be getting more and more applicable on South Africa’s current state!  His story should be a warning to us! Only problem is, how can we do it differently? What would be the solution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xolani shongwe</title>
		<link>http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>xolani shongwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mybigdebate.com/?p=115#comment-151</guid>
		<description>transformation is being much determined by the leading party. for they have made the transformation to suit themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>transformation is being much determined by the leading party. for they have made the transformation to suit themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
